Exceptional preservation and foot structure reveal ecological transitions and lifestyles of early theropod flyers

Jun 18, 2023

Nature Communications volume 13, Article number: 7684 (2022) Cite this article

12k Accesses

1 Citations

637 Altmetric

Metrics details

Morphology of keratinised toe pads and foot scales, hinging of foot joints and claw shape and size all inform the grasping ability, cursoriality and feeding mode of living birds. Presented here is morphological evidence from the fossil feet of early theropod flyers. Foot soft tissues and joint articulations are qualitatively assessed using laser-stimulated fluorescence. Pedal claw shape and size are quantitatively analysed using traditional morphometrics. We interpret these foot data among existing evidence to better understand the evolutionary ecology of early theropod flyers. Jurassic flyers like Anchiornis and Archaeopteryx show adaptations suggestive of relatively ground-dwelling lifestyles. Early Cretaceous flyers then diversify into more aerial lifestyles, including generalists like Confuciusornis and specialists like the climbing Fortunguavis. Some early birds, like the Late Jurassic Berlin Archaeopteryx and Early Cretaceous Sapeornis, show complex ecologies seemingly unique among sampled modern birds. As a non-bird flyer, finding affinities of Microraptor to a more specialised raptorial lifestyle is unexpected. Its hawk-like characteristics are rare among known theropod flyers of the time suggesting that some non-bird flyers perform specialised roles filled by birds today. We demonstrate diverse ecological profiles among early theropod flyers, changing as flight developed, and some non-bird flyers have more complex ecological roles.

The ecology of early theropod flyers has been revealed in part by prior studies involving their anatomy, diet, locomotor abilities and habitats1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. The foot anatomy of living birds varies greatly due to the diverse ecological roles they perform9,10,11,12. These ecological roles include leg-based launch in flying birds, perching, wading and swimming, as well as prey capture and dismemberment13,14. In the context of existing ecological data1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, we refine the ecological profiles of early theropod flyers by comparing their toe pads, foot scales, claws and joints with living birds. In particular, we combine soft tissue and joint details visible in the best-preserved specimens and under laser-stimulated fluorescence (LSF)15, along with quantitative analysis of claw shape and size using traditional morphometrics.

The keratinised covering of the foot, referred to as the podotheca, encompasses a variety of scale types that collectively cover the fleshy toe pads on the plantar foot surface16, the lateral and dorsal surfaces of the digits, and portions of the metatarsus. In modern birds, morphological differences in the scales and toe pads have been correlated to locomotory and feeding preferences10,11. Specifically, flattened toe pads are found in perching and ground-dwelling birds, or non-predatory birds that use their feet for manipulation of food (e.g., parrots)10. ‘Well-developed’ pads (i.e., those with moderately convex, semi-lenticular outlines in lateral view) and/or ‘protrusive’ pads (i.e., those with strongly convex, semi-oval or semi-circular outlines in lateral view) are found primarily in modern birds that use their feet for hunting, as they provide additional grip10. Reticulate scales on the plantar surface of modern raptor feet also reflect prey preference. Sharply pointed reticulate scales (called ‘spicules’) are most commonly associated with the osprey (Accipitriformes: Accipitridae: Pandion sp.), a specialist piscivore17, but are widespread among grasping raptors (e.g., falconids, accipitrids)11. Somewhat sharpened reticulate scales are also found in toucan feet (ramphastids) that are used for food manipulation and in some woodpeckers (picids)11 that are adept vertical climbers. Like protrusive pads10, spicules provide additional grip18, which is critical for raptorial birds that rely on their feet for prey capture.

Two main types of toe pad arrangement are typically present in modern birds18,19. The arthral condition, in which the toe pad is aligned with the interphalangeal joint (Fig. 1), is characteristic of the raptorial species. The mesarthral condition, in which the toe pad is aligned with the phalanx itself (Fig. 1), is found in non-raptorial forms. These two conditions do not include pads that cover more than one entire phalanx, although the latter are also widespread among extant birds20. Toe pad position (i.e., mesarthral vs. arthral) in modern birds appears to be driven by prey choice and feeding behaviour rather than common ancestry10, although there is also considerable variation within species and even individuals20. Arthral toe pads are found in a range of non-avialan theropods that are mostly associated with a carnivory-dominated diet (e.g., carcharodontosaurians, tyrannosauroids and dromaeosaurids21,22). However, since carnivory is the ancestral condition of theropods23,24,25 and arthral pads have been recently identified in the ornithischian Psittacosaurus26, common ancestry cannot be ruled out as a driver of their toe pad position.

Schematic of select early theropod flyers showing the proportions and arrangement of the toe bones and the morphology and arrangement of the toe pads. Missing pads (i.e., those not preserved) are not indicated. Toe pads in all taxa are arthrally arranged, except Yanornis, which are mesarthral in digit III. Illustrations based on Microraptor (STM 5-75, STM 5-109, STM 5-172), Anchiornis (STM 0-1, STM 0-114, STM 0-147), Yanornis (STM 9-531), Sapeornis (HGM 41HIII0405), and Confuciusornis (STM 13-55).

Modern birds with an arthral and mesarthral arrangement both activate the tendon-locking mechanism (TLM) during grasping27. The TLM maintains digit flexion during perching or prey capture without additional muscular requirements, and is found in nearly all modern birds (excluding palaeognaths, e.g., emus, rheas)27. The pad-over-joint arthral arrangement activates the TLM more efficiently than the pad-over-phalanx mesarthral arrangement, suggesting it is a grasping adaption10,27. However, it is unknown if the observed modern relationship between the TLM and toe pad alignment was also present in early flyers because the TLM is not found in palaeognaths and its fossil record is poor. Thus, arthral arrangement of the toe pads is not considered a specialised grasping adaptation in our fossil analysis.

Modern bird claw shape and size have been investigated for decades. These data have been used to study theropod palaeoecology28 using a variety of approaches (e.g., ref. 29,30,31; see ref. 32, 33 for information about vertebrate claws more generally). A recent review8 found that the most effective method was traditional morphometrics involving statistically processed measurements of toe length, relative size of the digits and claw curvature9,34. Specifically, traditional morphometrics was able to separate raptors that pinned prey to the ground, struck prey concussively with a closed foot, exclusively constricted prey to death, and whose talons pierced deeply into prey9,34. The morphometric dataset used here12 was collected using the same measurements as9,34 where linear measurements were taken directly and angular measurements were taken from photographs. The dataset used here12 has a broader overall phylogenetic coverage (21 families vs 15 in ref. 9, 34), applies ecological categories to a broader range of taxa (n = 66 here, n = 39 in ref. 9, 34) and uses bone-based landmarks that better apply to fossils. The dataset also lacks measurements of non-claw phalanges compared to9,34 because toe bones are typically disarticulated and mixed up in modern skeletal specimens which makes them difficult to identify12. Striking and restraining raptorial behaviour, as seen in most accipitrids and falconids, is associated with an increase in claw curvature, an enlargement of digit I, and the enlargement of an opposing digit (usually digit II)9,12,34. Specialised constricting raptors (i.e., raptors that have specialised pedal anatomy for constricting prey combined with a dietary niche restricted to animals small enough to be constricted) such as owls tend to have slightly increased claw curvature and claws of subequal size9,12,34. Ospreys, which specialise in piercing talons into fish, are similar to constrictors but have much more recurved talons9,12,34. Non-raptorial birds tend to have claws that are the same size on each toe or have an enlarged digit III12. Non-raptorial ground birds have claws with very little curvature12. Non-raptorial perching birds tend to have strongly curved claws12 (but see ref. 35).

Modern birds may possess any combination of strongly or weakly ginglymoid foot joints (tarsometatarsal and interphalangeal articulations)34. Strongly ginglymoid joints are hinge-like joints that restrict the phalangeal range of motion to a sagittal plane, allowing for greater resistance to torsional loads while exerting a strong grip34,36,37. Weakly ginglymoid joints are much flatter, less hinge-like joints that allow a greater range of motion, including mediolateral movements34,36. Generally, increases in joint ginglymoidy are interpreted as an increase in grip force34,37. Strongly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints are observed in all modern birds of prey, as well as in eudromaeosaurian dromaeosaurids34,37. These provide the joints with greater resistance to torsion, beneficial for hunting large struggling prey34. Weakly ginglymoid joints are observed in modern cursorial birds, such as ratites and emu, and in cursorial non-avialan theropods such as ornithomimosaurians34,36,37. Weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints on digit III are considered highly indicative of cursoriality, as the central toe of a running animal is expected to experience low torsional stress34,36. Digits II and IV may be either ginglymoid or weakly ginglymoid in cursorial taxa since they resist lateral movement and thus experience more torsional strain34,36.

Here we apply this foot-based ecomorphological framework from modern birds to exceptionally well-preserved specimens of the early theropod flyers Ambopteryx (gliding only6), Anchiornis, Archaeopteryx, Confuciusornis, Fortunguavis, Microraptor, Sapeornis and Yanornis4. We do so on the basis that the study taxa are the closest fossil relatives of modern birds and have feet that share morphological and functional similarities with modern birds9,21,22,28,29,30,31,34,37,38. Some modern bird lifestyles require specific adaptations, e.g., modern perching and raptorial lifestyles require one or more opposable digits. There are special cases where lines of evidence may point to such modern lifestyles but associated specialisations are either absent or less developed. The implications of these special cases are discussed as these may shed valuable light on the evolution of modern lifestyles. Modern crocodylian feet are not useful comparisons to the study taxa as they are morphologically and functionally distinct in being plantigrade, often webbed and specialised for a semi-aquatic lifestyle39. We interpret our fossil foot data in the context of existing ecological data for early theropod flyers to refine our understanding of the ecological profiles present at the origins of theropod flight.

Over 1000 fossils of a phylogenetically broad range of early theropod flyers were studied under LSF40 at the Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature in Shandong Province, China. This collection revealed 12 specimens with toe pads, foot scales and claws that were either partially or completely preserved and belong to the early flyers Anchiornis, Confuciusornis, Sapeornis, Yanornis and Microraptor. This subset samples anchiornithids, early-diverging pygostylians, early-diverging ornithuromorphs and microraptorines. However, to better sample the earliest avialan flyers, the Berlin and Thermopolis Archaeopteryx specimens were studied first-hand in Germany and the United States, respectively, although these did not yield pedal soft tissues under LSF. To further increase the phylogenetic breadth of our analyses, specimens of Ambopteryx and Fortunguavis were also included using claw data from the literature and published photographs, even though they lacked well-preserved pedal soft tissues. Ambopteryx was chosen as an example of a non-paravian theropod flyer (gliding only6) whilst Fortunguavis was chosen to represent Enantiornithes. Definitions of soft tissue features are provided in the Methods section and in Supplementary Fig. 1. In this section, we present morphological descriptions of skeletal and soft tissue pedal anatomy (Figs. 1–6) as well as traditional morphometrics of pedal claws that are interpreted via principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) (Figs. 7 and 8 and Tables 1 and 2).

Fossil under a white light and b laser-stimulated fluorescence. c Close-up of reticulate and scutellate scales on digit IV, with arrows indicating exemplary spiculate reticulate scales. d Interpretive drawing, where solid lines indicate preserved structural boundaries, and dashed lines represent assumed or completed boundaries. Note the arthral arrangement of toe pads in which the interpad creases do not align with the phalangeal joints.

Fossil under a white light and b laser-stimulated fluorescence. c Close-up of reticulate and scutellate scales on digit IV. d Interpretive drawing, where solid lines indicate preserved structural boundaries, and dashed lines represent assumed or completed boundaries.

Fossil under a white light and b laser-stimulated fluorescence. c Close-up of reticulate scales on digit II. d Interpretive drawing, where solid lines indicate preserved structural boundaries, and dashed lines represent assumed or completed boundaries.

Interpretive drawing, where solid lines indicate preserved structural boundaries, and dashed lines represent assumed or completed boundaries. Based on a photograph by S. Abramowicz in ref. 106.

Fossil under a white light and b laser-stimulated fluorescence. c Interpretive drawing, where solid lines indicate preserved structural boundaries, and dashed lines represent assumed or completed boundaries.

Datasets a include and b exclude measurements of digit I, as most of the fossil paravians in this study do not preserve digit I. In both graphs, claw curvature increases across PC1 and claw size relative to digit III increases across PC2. See Fig. 8 for precise character loadings. Taxon abbreviations: Am Ambopteryx IVPP V24192, An1 Anchiornis STM 0-1, An2 Anchiornis STM 0-114, An3 Anchiornis STM 0-147, Ar1 Archaeopteryx MB.Av.101, Ar2 Archaeopteryx WDC-CSG-100, C1 Confuciusornis IVPP V13156, C2 Confuciusornis STM 13-55, F Fortunguavis IVPP V24192, M1 Microraptor STM 5-75, M2 Microraptor STM 5-109, M3 Microraptor STM 5-172, S Sapeornis HGM 41HIII0405, Y Yanornis IVPP V13558.

Ambopteryx (IVPP V24192) may have weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal articulations on the distal end of digits III-2 and IV-341. However, this observation is uncertain due to the poor preservation of the phalanges. The articulation surfaces of the remaining phalanges and of the distal facets of the tarsometatarsus also could not be identified due to their poor preservation.

The digital pads in Microraptor (STM 5–75, STM 5–109, STM 5–172) are arthrally arranged (Figs. 1 and 2). Due to inconsistent preservation, only a single pad—the claw pad, which covers the claw tubercle—is visible on digit II of any specimen within our sample (STM 5–75). This pad is partially preserved but appears well-developed. Digit III preserves three well-developed pads (including the claw pad), with a broad fold between the first and second pad, and a smaller fold between the second and third pad. On digit IV, there are four pads, including the claw pad. In STM 5–109, the first pad (spanning the joint between phalanges IV-1 and IV-2) is protrusive, semi-oval in outline, and separated from the second pad by a broad fold. Furrows separate the remaining pads. In STM 5–75, where it is best preserved, the tarsal pad is protrusive and widely separated by a furrow from the first pad of digit IV.

Based on the most wholly preserved specimen, STM 5–109, three distinct scale morphologies are present: (1) sub-rectangular, polarised, scutate scales on the dorsal part of each digit (~0.32–1.05 mm anteroposterior length); (2) polygonal, subrounded and irregular, non-imbricating scutellate scales on the lateral surfaces of the phalanges and dorsolateral surfaces of the digital pads (~0.13–0.88 mm diameter), and (3) minute polygonal, subrounded and irregular, non-imbricating reticulate scales that cover the undersides of the digital pads (~0.10–0.55 mm diameter). Where exposed in lateral view in STM 5–109 (i.e., along the ventral margins), the reticulate scales are strongly convex and resemble spicules on at least the second pad of digit IV (Fig. 2c).

Digits II, III, and IV of Microraptor all have strongly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints (e.g., STM 5–109, STM 5–172) (Fig. 2a). The joints are particularly well preserved in STM 5–109. Although sagittal furrows at the distal end of the phalanges are not completely observable, the hinge-like distal articulation facets are distinct in almost all of the phalanges. The concave proximal ends of the phalanges are also easily observed in lateral view. Distal facets of metatarsal II and metatarsal III in STM 5–109 are moderately ginglymoid. Joint articulations are unclear in Microraptor STM 5–75 due to poor preservation, but presumably resembled those of the other specimens in life.

The toe pads of Anchiornis (STM 0–1, STM 0–7, STM 0–114, STM 0–125, STM 0–144, STM 0–147) are arthrally arranged (Figs. 1 and 3). The hallux preserves a well-developed claw pad and two smaller pads along the length of the first phalanx. Only the large, well-developed claw pad of digit II is visible in any specimen (STM 0–114). Three well-developed toe pads are present on digit III, although they are not all represented in any single specimen; furrows/folds cannot be discerned as a result. On digit IV, there are four relatively low pads that are semi-lenticular in outline, and therefore are less well-developed than in Microraptor. A fold is present between the penultimate pad and the claw pad (STM 0–1, STM 0–114), whereas furrows separate the remaining pads. Unlike in Microraptor, the tarsal pad (STM 0–144, STM 0–147) is well-developed (not protrusive) and separated from the similarly sized first pad of digit IV by a wide furrow. All pads, including the tarsal pad, are semi-lenticular in the lateral aspect. Minute reticulate scales cover the ventral surfaces of the digital and tarsal pads in STM 0–147 (~0.14–0.48 mm diameter on the digital pads, up to ~0.56 mm diameter on the tarsal pad). These reticulate scales are subrounded in plantar view, uniformly distributed, and typically globose (but have lower relief than in Microraptor), although in part of STM 0–114, most noticeably on digit IV, they appear to form sharp spicules. Scutellate scales (~0.19–0.83 mm diameter) cover the lateral and dorsolateral portions of the digits in STM 0–147, and are most frequently subrounded, or less commonly polygonal-to-irregular. Probable scutate scales are only sporadically visible in STM 0–147, where they form a faint row of polarised scales dorsal to some of the phalanges (~0.96–1.40 mm anteroposterior length).

In most of the Anchiornis specimens we studied (STM 0–1, STM 0–125, STM 0–147) digits II, III, and IV have weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints (Fig. 3a). The two exceptions include STM 0–7 and STM 0–114, in which digit IV of STM 0–7 has ginglymoid interphalangeal joints, and digit III-1 of STM 0–114 has a distal end that appears ginglymoid. The distal tarsometatarsal facets are also weakly ginglymoid (STM 0–1, STM 0–7, STM 0–144).

In the Berlin specimen of Archaeopteryx (MB.Av.101)42, the interphalangeal joints are all weakly ginglymoid. The distal facets of the tarsometatarsus are not observable in this specimen. The Thermopolis specimen of Archaeopteryx (WDC-CSG-100)43 has ginglymoid joints in digit II-1 of the right pes and digit III-1 of the left pes, in which the hinge-like distal articulation can be observed clearly. The interphalangeal joints of digit IV and digit III-2 of the right pes appear to be weakly ginglymoid. The distal tarsometatarsal articulations are weakly ginglymoid on both left and right pes. No observable podotheca is preserved for Archaeopteryx.

We imaged over 500 specimens of Confuciusornis using LSF at the STM and IVPP. We identified the best pedal soft tissues in two specimens, STM 13–55 and IVPP V13156. STM 13–55 is a complete, articulated female individual based on the absence of ornamental retrices on the tail44. The pedes are exposed in plantar view, although only the left foot preserves notable details of the podotheca (Fig. 4). Digit I is well preserved and shrouded by a single pad that encloses the first phalanx and the flexor tubercle of the claw. The first toe pad of digit II is the only additional pad preserved on the specimen and has a similar level of development to the toe pads of Anchiornis: the pad is relatively flat, semi-lenticular in outline, spans the joint between the first and second phalanx (i.e., exhibits arthral arrangement; Figs. 1 and 4), and is separated from digit I by a broad furrow. Reticulate scales on the digits are small (~0.11–0.62 mm in diameter) but not clearly visible due to imperfect preservation. The ventral margins of the pads reveal reticulate scales with low domical (globate) shapes. Incompletely preserved scutate scales are present on the dorsal surface of digit I and on the proximal end of the metatarsus. A previously identified tarsal pad (Fig. 4c of ref. 38) on the left foot of a different specimen (IVPP V13156) could not be verified. Inspection of the published figures show that the margins are not well preserved enough to identify this as a toe pad or as a possible web between digits I and II. These authors38 also reported the presence of large phalangeal pads and smaller ‘interphalangeal pads’ (=folds) on the digits; however, we also could not identify these on the available figures.

Only one specimen described above, Confuciusornis STM 13–55, has clear preservation of the pedal joints. The interphalangeal joints of digits II, III, and IV are ginglymoid (Fig. 4a, b). From the right pes, hinge-like distal articulation is particularly visible on digit II-2, digit III-1, and digit III-3. In the tarsometatarsus, the distal facet of metatarsal III is ginglymous although the facet is unclear in metatarsal I, II, and IV.

The podotheca of Sapeornis is well preserved on the feet of specimen 41HIII0405 (Fig. 5). All digital pads, including that on the hallux, are well-developed and arthrally arranged (Figs. 1 and 5). Based on the left pes, digit I has only a single (claw) pad, with a wide furrow that extends most of the length of phalanx I-1. Digit II of the left pes bears two pads, including the claw pad, separated by a fold. A wide furrow appears to be present between the proximal pad of digit II and the furrow on digit I. As seen on the right pes, digit III bears three pads including the claw pad, each separated by a fold. Only the claw pad is unambiguously visible on digit IV of the left pes, although the outline of two additional pads on digit IV of the left pes may be superimposed over part of the adjacent digit III. The right pes more clearly shows at least three visible pads on digit IV. The tarsal pad is not visible on either pes, although we cannot rule out that it hasn't been obscured by the hallux or another part of the foot. Only a single type of scale is present: subcircular-to-irregular, globose reticulate scales are distributed along the underside of all four digits (as preserved) and along the dorsal margin on digit I, where they are less well-defined. These reticulate scales measure ~0.15–0.73 mm in diameter on the digits, and up to 0.94 mm in diameter on the ventral surface of the metatarsus. Spicules and other scale types are absent.

The interphalangeal joints of digits II, III, and IV are strongly ginglymoid in Sapeornis specimen 41HIII0405 (Fig. 5). The proximal end of the phalanges are all visibly concave on the left pes. The hinge-like distal end of the phalanges are visible, and ginglymoidy is prominent in phalanges II-1 and III-2 where the round distal ends fit into the concavity of the proximal end of the adjacent phalanges. The distal articulations of metatarsal II and metatarsal III are ginglymoid and distal metatarsal IV is weakly ginglymoid in the left pes.

Fortunguavis (IVPP V18631) has a mixture of fully and weakly ginglymoid joints45. Although the preservation of the distal end of digit II-1 makes it difficult to observe the joint surface, the sagittal ridge on the proximal end of digit II-2 suggests a ginglymoid articulation. A hinge-like sagittal furrow is present at the distal end of all of the digit III non-ungual phalanges. The proximal end of digit III-3 appears concave with an observable sagittal ridge, whereas the proximal ends of digit III-1 and III-2 are less concave. Thus, digit III has a combination of ginglymoid and weakly ginglymoid articulations. Most phalanges of digit IV are too crushed to observe articulations, though IV-4 does appear fully ginglymoid at both ends. We are unable to determine if the distal facets of metatarsals I or II are ginglymoid. Metatarsal III has a weakly ginglymoid distal facet, and metatarsal IV has a ginglymoid distal facet. No observable podotheca is preserved for Fortunguavis.

The feet of Yanornis STM 9-531 are exposed in dorsal view, therefore it is not possible to determine the pad shape (Fig. 6). Nevertheless, shallow invaginations in the medial margin of the integument along the length of digit III confirm that the toe pads were mesarthrally arranged within this particular digit, which contrasts with the other taxa in this study (Fig. 1). However, digit II appears to show arthral arrangement of its single distinguishable toe pad. Other details are difficult to confirm as digits II and III and digits III and IV are closely appressed for most of their length; only the claw of digit IV and phalanges III-3 and III-4 (claw) of digit III are free. Two scale types are visible on the pes: scutellate scales (~0.23–1.07 mm diameter) covering most of the dorsal surface of the pes, and scutate scales covering the dorsal surfaces of the phalanges of digits II–IV, and the distal one-third of the metatarsals (~0.57–1.87 mm anteroposterior length). Definitive reticulate scales cannot be seen as preserved in the dorsal aspect.

All Yanornis specimens studied (STM 9-531 [Fig. 6a] and IVPP V1335846 which lacks a podotheca) have weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints. Weak hinge-like distal ends of phalanges are visible in IVPP V13358. The proximal ends of the phalanges are only weakly concave. Morphologies of the distal facets of the tarsometatarsus in both STM 9-531 and IVPP V13358 are not visible.

Principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) plots of traditional morphometrics (TM) data are provided in Fig. 7, with character weights plotted in Fig. 8. Discriminant predictions for LDA are provided in Table 1. In the PCA, PC1 represents claw curvature and PC2 represents the ratio in size between the digits of the foot. In the LDA, claw curvature has little effect on separation (though its effect generally increases in LDs that are less influential overall), with the ratio of digits I and II to digit III opposed to the effect of digit IV. See ref. 12 for a discussion of the trends for modern groups in these data. As digit I is not preserved in several fossil specimens, data are presented that include and exclude digit I, so that all of the study specimens could be included.

Plots are provided for datasets with a digit I included and b excluded. In both plots, PC1 is dominated by claw curvature where increased curvature corresponds to increasing PC1 values, and PC2 is dominated by increasing ratios of arc lengths of digits I, II, and IV relative to digit III.

PC1 and PC2 (Fig. 7) explain 74.1% of the total variance when all digits are included and 79.5% with digit I excluded. Ambopteryx (IVPP V24192) occupies a unique region of the morphospace, plotting on PC1 similar to ground birds and on PC2 similar to perching birds. One specimen of Anchiornis (STM 0-114) also inhabits a unique region of the morphospace, with highly enlarged unguals I and II and extremely low claw curvature (with and without digit I included), while the remaining two specimens (STM 0-1, STM 0-147) plot among ground-dwelling birds. Two specimens of Microraptor (STM 5-75, STM 5-172) plot among restraining raptors, with the third (STM 5-109) in an otherwise uninhabited region of the morphospace representing a uniquely large digit I and II relative to digit III. Archaeopteryx (MB.Av.101, WDC-CSG-100) and Confuciusornis plot in the intermediary region between ground birds and specialised constricting raptors. With digit I included, all specimens show greater raptorial affinity, except Archaeopteryx specimen MB.Av.101, which shows greater ground bird and shrike affinities. Regardless of the inclusion of digit I, Sapeornis and Fortunguavis (IVPP V24192) plot with perching birds, and Yanornis plots with ground birds.

Discriminant predictions for LDA (Table 1) are consistent regardless of the inclusion of digit I, except for Fortunguavis and the Berlin Archaeopteryx specimen (MB.Av.101) where confidence decreases for the most likely prediction if digit I is excluded. Ambopteryx, Confuciusornis, and Yanornis are recovered as very likely to be specialised constricting raptors with some ground bird affinities. All three specimens of Microraptor are predicted as most likely having a restraining raptorial lifestyle, with striking and specialised constricting raptorial lifestyles the next most likely. One specimen of Anchiornis (STM 0-147) is recovered as equally likely to have a striking or specialised constricting raptorial lifestyle. The other two (STM 0-1, STM 0-114) are recovered as very likely to be ground birds. The Thermopolis Archaeopteryx (WDC-CSG-100) is recovered as most likely to be a striking or specialised constricting raptor. The Berlin Archaeopteryx (MB.Av.101) shows affinities with scavenging and ground birds. However, when digit I is excluded, restraining raptorial predation becomes the most likely result for MB.Av.101. Sapeornis is recovered as most likely to be a perching bird, with a lower likelihood of being either a constricting or striking raptor. Fortunguavis always shows some affinity with non-raptorial perching birds and restraint raptors. An affinity with striking raptors is only recovered when digit I is included. An affinity with specialised constricting raptors is only recovered when digit I is excluded. Discriminant analysis of principal components (DAPC) and its predictions are identical to LDA.

The exclusion of digit I from the data decreases the accuracy of the analysis, but precision is retained. In other words, the exclusion of digit I does not affect the ability to separate ecological categories, although modern birds are less likely to be correctly assigned. When using LDA equations to reclassify modern taxa, Fleiss’ Kappa47 comparing reclassifications to the true assignments was higher when digit I data were included (0.72 with digit I, 0.66 without). Phylogenetic honest significant differences (pairwise function comparing means) using the R package RRPP48 recovered the same number of statistically different ecological groups regardless of the inclusion or exclusion of digit I (compare Table 2 with Table S1 in ref. 12). Kmult49 for TM data is 0.60 with DI excluded, and 0.66 with DI included.

Historically, early theropod flyer ecology has been based on their anatomy, diet, aerial and terrestrial locomotion capabilities as well as the environments and climates they lived in1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.

Our analysis of their preserved pedal soft tissues and claws reveals a large diversity in foot morphology that, when compared to modern birds, allows us to constrain the ecological profiles of early theropod flyers as flight evolved. Starting with the early gliding-only scansoriopterygids6, we find that the foot claws of Ambopteryx are weakly recurved with comparable size and superficial morphology to those of modern owls. However, Ambopteryx lacks opposed digits41 suggesting it was not a grasping hunter9. Given this, the weakly recurved claws of Ambopteryx point to a ground-dwelling lifestyle. The pedal morphology of Ambopteryx is similar to the ground-dwelling oviraptorosaurians (Scansoriopterygidae has been recovered within Oviraptorosauria in some analyses50,51,52), so this morphology could be partly inherited from their common ancestor. The extreme climbing adaptations in the forelimbs of Ambopteryx and other scansoriopterygids53 point to a scansorial ecological profile, so it may be that these were adequate for a scansorial lifestyle without specialisations in the hindlimb.

Non-avialan-powered flyers are represented by Microraptor in our dataset, which shows the most raptorial affinities within our sample. Its soft tissue (i.e., podotheca) morphology (Figs. 1 and 2), claw data using PCA and LDA (Fig. 7 and Table 1), preserved meals54,55,56 and powered flapping flight potential4 all suggest it was equipped to hunt flying and difficult-to-hold prey. The protrusive pads of Microraptor are located on both the tarsal pad and the proximal-most pad of digit IV. This is indicative of precise grasping capability, as protrusive pads provide a predatory advantage, acting like additional ‘fingers’ that penetrate the feathers/fur of struggling prey10,57. Strongly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints also serve to increase Microraptor's grasping capabilities. These shared conditions with modern avivorous raptors suggest that their potential prey was birds, select non-avialan theropods, small pterosaurs, and gliding mammals58. The PCA and LDA analyses further indicate Microraptor was most likely a restraining raptor, using its enlarged digit II in a pinning role as in Deinonychus34, consistent with past work on its long bones and non-claw phalanges37. However, digit I is problematic in this scenario as it is the smallest digit59 and could not work in opposition to digit II to grip prey9 (contra60). Instead, the main grip of digit II was probably assisted by Microraptor resting its body weight on the tarsometatarsus34. This hypothesis is supported by the small size of its preserved prey54,55,61,62, which would be effectively pinned under Microraptor's weight.

In Anchiornis, a ground-dwelling lifestyle and adaptations for taking non-volant prey are represented by podotheca soft tissue morphology (Figs. 1 and 3), claw data using PCA and LDA (Fig. 7 and Table 1), weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints (Fig. 1), preserved meals63 and its relatively poor potential for powered flight4. ‘Well-developed’ toe pads in Anchiornis indicate raptorial capabilities associated with hunting ground-dwelling prey, as in modern birds10. The potential for weaker powered flapping flight in Anchiornis compared to other early flyers (including Microraptor4), supports a more ground-focussed lifestyle. This is consistent with weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints typical of cursorial avian and non-avian dinosaurs34,36, and lizards and fish preserved in its digestive tract63. Microraptor and Anchiornis both retained an ancestral, functionally tridactyl foot with a reduced digit I. However, unlike Microraptor, Anchiornis lacks protrusional pads, suggesting that it was less capable of hunting volant prey, and which is further supported by its weaker flight capabilities4. The Anchiornis specimens show low claw curvature (contra64) and a small digit II claw relative to the digit III claw (also relative to the length of the non-claw phalanges37). Both of these characteristics do not indicate pinning/striking raptorial behaviour and are not found in modern scavenging vultures or perching birds. Specialised constricting raptorial behaviour is mechanically unlikely as Anchiornis lacks fully opposed pedal digits (Fig. 3). Therefore, the podotheca data above as well as prior work indicating relatively weaker flight capability4, both complement our PCA and LDA data in supporting a primarily terrestrial lifestyle for Anchiornis.

Although the podothecae are not preserved, the Berlin and Thermopolis specimens of Archaeopteryx have less recurved claws than most modern scavenging and perching birds. This is consistent with past work on claw curvature30,65, non-ungual phalangeal proportions66, limb bone length67, and discrete locomotor traits2 (contra past work on claw curvature28,64). This feature is similar to modern specialised constricting raptors or birds with a terrestrial lifestyle. Similarly sized claws, found only in the Thermopolis specimen, is another characteristic of modern specialised constricting raptors. However, the Thermopolis specimen is arguably more consistent with a terrestrial lifestyle as it lacks the ‘enhanced’ opposable digits (i.e., larger digit I or opposable digit IV) found in raptors that use their feet to grip prey9. The overall weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal and tarsometatarsal joints also indicate a pes that was poorly adapted for grasping. The digit III claw of the Berlin specimen is proportionally larger than most modern specialised constricting raptors or ground birds, consistent with non-claw phalangeal proportions68. Combined with the low curvature of all of its claws and primarily weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal articulations, this suggests an ecology with no modern analogue among our dataset. The Berlin and Thermopolis specimens have been proposed as separate species, particularly based on differences in claw morphology43,69, which may explain their different ecological signals.

A generalist lifestyle was previously proposed for Confuciusornis using qualitative jaw observations and a fish consumulite70, but the latter has been brought into doubt1. A generalist lifestyle is currently supported by different ecological signals from its claws, podotheca and jaws. Similarly sized, low-mid curvature claws indicate two possible lifestyles. Firstly, a specialised constricting raptorial lifestyle agreeable with past work on claw curvature64 and non-claw phalanges37. Alternatively, a terrestrial lifestyle consistent with previous work on non-claw phalangeal proportions66, limb bone length67 and qualitative evaluation of the pes71 (contra past work on limb bone length72, claw curvature65, discrete locomotor traits2 and qualitative evaluation of the pes73,74,75,76) (Fig. 7 and Table 1). The few observable toe pads of Confuciusornis are low, indicating less raptorial affinities than Microraptor (Figs. 1, 2 and 4). Ginglymoid interphalangeal articulations in Confuciusornis point towards adaptations for grasping, though they do not distinguish between grasping for raptorial predation or non-predatory perching or climbing. Previous work shows that the jaw has a high mechanical advantage and stress profile similar to modern herbivores8,77. We also note that Confuciusornis was extremely common in its volcanically active, wet to semi-arid habitat78. Generalists tend to dominate volatile modern environments79, further supporting our proposal of Confuciusornis as an ecological generalist.

Past work has shown Sapeornis to be an unexpectedly herbivorous80,81,82 thermal soarer80,83, as modern thermal soarers are mainly carnivorous84. This conflict between herbivory- and carnivory-related traits is also seen in our additional claw and toe pad data. Sapeornis’ recurved claws and large digit III claw fits a non-raptorial perching bird, consistent with reconstructions of it as an arboreal herbivore. This is agreeable with past work on claw curvature64,65, limb bone length67, discrete locomotor traits2, and qualitative evaluation of the pes85. ‘Well-developed’ toe pads (Figs. 1 and 5)86 suggest a grasping capability, which could benefit carnivorous feeding. Highly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints also point to grasping capability, but as in Confuciusornis, do not necessarily indicate raptorial grasping. These unusual characteristics of Sapeornis suggest it was an ecologically complex herbivorous thermal soarer that supplemented its diet with meat, perhaps analogous to the modern palm-nut vulture (Gypohierax)87.

Fortunguavis is an enantiornithine that was originally proposed as scansorial45. PCA and LDA claw data support a non-raptorial perching lifestyle. However, our dataset does not allow a climbing lifestyle to be tested as it does not distinguish climbing specialists from non-raptorial perching birds. In the PCA, the claws of Fortunguavis fall just outside those of non-raptorial perching birds (Fig. 7). In the original study2,45 and our PCA, Fortunguavis plots near macaw parrots (Ara), which are birds that commonly scale trees and enclosure netting and were classified as aerial foragers rather than climbers2. Increasing ginglymoidy of more distal, non-claw phalanges also parallels the pattern in living macaws88 and stem parrots89, which we interpret as a compromise between flexibility and grip strength for arboreal locomotion. In LDA, Fortunguavis has a consistent affinity with perchers (Table 1).

Preserved soft tissues on the foot of Yanornis STM 9-531 are exposed in dorsal view (Fig. 6), which limited the inferences that could be made about this individual diet or behaviour. Although the lateral toe pad shapes are not observable, the pads are mesarthrally arranged on digit III, which is in contrast to all other taxa studied here. Mesarthral pads are found in modern non-raptorial birds18,19, suggesting that Yanornis had a less efficient grasping capability than other early flyers in this study10,27. Yanornis IVPP V13558 has claws that are relatively straight, most similar to modern ground birds and specialised constricting raptors (Fig. 7 and Table 1). Specialised constricting raptors are noted as having relatively short phalanges compared to their claws9, as opposed to Yanornis that has long phalanges and relatively short claws (compare90,91). A specialised constricting raptorial lifestyle is also inconsistent with the mesarthral toe pads and weakly ginglymoid interphalangeal joints in Yanornis. Thus, pedal data points towards a primarily ground-dwelling ecology, consistent with past work on avialan limb bone length67 and reconstructions of Cretaceous ornithurans as non-arboreal92 (contra work on non-claw phalanges37). Furthermore, preserved meals provide definitive evidence of Yanornis consuming fish46,90, and are agreeable with its reconstruction as a non-arboreal bird.

Our study demonstrates that early theropod flyers had diverse ecological profiles. The more ground-dwelling profiles we recovered in the earliest Middle-Late Jurassic flyers Ambopteryx, Anchiornis and Archaeopteryx indicate that their weaker flight capabilities3,4,6 did not permit a fully aerial lifestyle. Ambopteryx shows climbing and gliding forelimbs that were decoupled from its characteristically ground-adapted hindlimbs. We find that the Early Cretaceous non-avialan flyer Microraptor has the profile of a highly specialised aerial hunter. Current data shows this lifestyle was unique within the Jehol Biota, and among all other known early theropod flyers. This suggests that specialised predatory roles filled by birds in modern ecosystems93 were performed by non-bird flyers like Microraptor. Confuciusornis is recovered as a generalist, while Fortunguavis is recovered as a perching bird, and Yanornis as primarily terrestrial. Other early flyers have ecological profiles different from any modern birds in this study that would be valuable to explore further, e.g., Berlin Archaeopteryx and Sapeornis. Generalists typically survive over specialists in times of ecosystem crisis94. Our results reveal early specialist non-avialan and avialan flyers that would be more susceptible to extinction during such crises. This should be taken into account as we work to better understand the turnover of theropod flyers and the rise of modern birds.

CMNH, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, United States; FMNH, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, United States; HGM, Henan Geological Museum, Zhengzhou, China; IVPP, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoanthroplogy, Beijing, China; MB, Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany; STM, Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature, Pingyi, China; WDC, Wyoming Dinosaur Center, Thermopolis, United States.

No relevant permits were needed for the work in this study. The collections visited made specimens available for study according to their own ethical guidelines. These specimens were studied according to the ethical guidelines of these collections.

Over 1000 early paravian fossils from the Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature were imaged using LSF40 in search of preserved pedal soft tissues (see ‘Laser-stimulated fluorescence’ section for more details). This revealed 12 specimens with exceptionally preserved foot pads that were selected and analysed. This involved studying the arrangement and proportions of the toe pads and scales of the podotheca, and the proportions and geometry of the pedal phalanges and claws. Previously published specimens of Confuciusornis38 and Sapeornis95 with preserved foot pads were also incorporated into the study, and claw measurements from an additional specimen of Yanornis (IVPP V13558) were sourced from the literature46 as our focal Yanornis pes (STM 9-531) is preserved in an orientation where claw morphometry was not possible. While no known scansoriopterygid or enantiornithine specimens preserve portions of the podotheca, we included claw measurements from Ambopteryx41 and Fortunguavis45 in order to more broadly comment on the ecology of theropod flight evolution. For the same reason, we also included photos of the Berlin and Thermopolis specimens of Archaeopteryx taken by M.P. and T.G.K.

Podothecae of 15 modern bird of prey species (spanning Pandionidae, Accipitridae, Tytonidae, Strigidae and Falconidae) and an additional sample of 21 species of modern non-predatory birds (spanning Psittaciformes, Passeriformes, Caprimulgiformes and Coraciformes) were studied in the collections of the University of New England Natural History Museum, Armidale, Australia and the Ornithology Collection of the Australian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, Australia. Measurements and photographs were collected in person at the University of New England by P.R.B. and N.J.E., and at the Australian Museum by L.R.T. See Tsang et al.10 and Supplementary Information herein for additional details.

Claws from 61 taxa covering a wide variety of crown bird families (particularly from raptorial birds) were sampled from the skeletal collections of the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, United States and the Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, United States. See ref. 12 and Supplementary Information herein for additional details. All claws were checked for high porosity, which is a common pathology among captive birds in enclosures with hard flooring (see also ref. 96). Measurements and photographs were collected in person by C.V.M.

Fossil specimens were imaged under LSF to reveal additional soft tissue details that were not visible under white light conditions, following the methodology of Wang et al.15 based on Kaye et al.40. A 405 nm violet near-UV laser diode was used to fluoresce the specimen according to standard laser safety protocol. Long exposure photographs were taken in a darkened room with a Nikon D810 DSLR camera fitted with a 425 nm blocking filter. Image post-processing (equalisation, saturation and colour balance) was performed uniformly across the entire field of view in Photoshop CS6.

Integumentary terminology for the podotheca (including scutate, scutellate, and reticulate scales) follows Lucas and Stettenheim16. Terminology for features on the plantar surface of the pes follows Lennerstedt18,19 and Tsang et al.10. Toe pads can be flat (low profile; flat plantar pad surface in lateral aspect), well-developed (high profile; convex plantar pad surface in lateral aspect with a semi-lenticular outline) or protrusional (very high profile; highly convex plantar pad surface with a semi-oval or semi-circular outline in lateral aspect; forming ‘fingers’) (Supplementary Fig. 1). A furrow forms the ‘hinge’ between toe pads, or between a toe pad and a fold. Furrows can be narrow and V-shaped or broad with an obvious flattened surface between successive toe pads. Folds are small, raised areas that occur between larger toe pads, and as a result, do not extend farther ventrally than the main toe pads (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Ecological categories for raptorial birds and their assignment generally follow9, with elaboration from12: Restraint - hawks, eagles (Accipitridae), forest-falcons (Micrastur), shrikes (Laniidae), and helmetshrikes (Vangidae) use their talons for prolonged prey restraint while they kill large prey slowly; Strike – falcons (Falconini), secretarybirds (Sagittarius) and seriemas (Cariamidae) are all known to use their feet for high-speed concussive strikes; Constriction - owls (Strigidae) are specialised to constrict small animals within their toes, mainly using talons to extend their reach; Pierce – ospreys (Pandion) pierce their talons into fish to aid in gripping as they extract them from the water. Our Constrict category supersedes the ‘Suffocate’ category in12. We renamed this category because constriction is a more encompassing term to use. This is because while constriction leading to suffocation has been confirmed in some birds97,98 some constrictors outside of birds have been shown to kill prey by cutting off their blood flow99.

Among non-raptorial birds, birds in the ‘ground’ and ‘perching’ categories spend the vast majority of their time on the ground or perched on a branch, respectively. Clades included in these groups follow12, and were selected to provide wide phylogenetic breadth.

Measurements and landmarks for TM follow ref. 9 with modifications from ref. 12 that permits their application to more fossil taxa. The seven parameters used in the TM analysis were outer arc curvature (Oo in °) for each digit (I, II, III and IV) and outer arc length (ALo) of digits I, II and IV expressed as a unitless ratio to the outer arc length of digit III (sensu9). Most fossil specimens in this study do not preserve digit I, so separate datasets were created both including and excluding this digit.

Linear measurements of modern claws were taken with a tape measure to avoid damaging the bones, except for measurements less than 1 cm which were collected with callipers. Photos were taken in lateral view and imported into CorelDraw X8 for angular measures using the ‘Angular Dimension’ tool. Photos taken at different angles were used to test for parallax effects, with angular measures not notably affected. In cases where digit identifications were uncertain, the claws were compared to taxidermy specimens from the same collection and referred to a digit based on their relative size and curvature.

Modern portions of the phylogenetic tree used in this study for phylogenetic mapping and honest significant difference correction were taken from birdtree.org100. Non-avian paravian branches were then grafted onto the modern tree following the topology of ref. 50. All species were placed at the age of their oldest discovery, with species divergences arbitrarily taking 10,000 years. All grafted lengths were scaled so that the total length of the modern portion of the tree was equal to 94 Ma based on an estimated origin of Aves by ref. 101.

As several fossil specimens do not preserve digit I, two separate datasets are needed so that all specimens can be used: one dataset that includes digit I measurements and another that excludes them. Two primary analyses were performed on each of these morphometric datasets: principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Both analyses reduce the dimensionality of the data making it easier to interpret, but do so with different goals. PCA maximizes the variance explained by the axes while LDA maximizes the separation of a priori groups102 (in this case ecological categories). All PCAs in this study use the correlation matrix, which removes the effects of units and scale by scaling inputs to constant variance.

Several adjustments need to be made for using LDA in this context. LDA requires all data to be uncorrelated, which is unlikely in biological data. We follow12 and use discriminate analysis of principal components (DAPC)103 to account for this. The LDA and DAPC results are identical showing that LDA is robust to the uncorrelated assumption. In addition, Pandion haliaetus was excluded from all LDA and phylogenetic honest significant differences as neither is designed to analyse groups with only one member.

TM variables of modern groups with more than one member were compared for significant differences using the pairwise() function (phylogenetic honest significant differences sensu12) in the R package RRPP48 version 1.1.2 in R version 4.1.2 (Table 2). A total of 1000 permutations were used by convention, with sensitivity analyses finding p values to converge before this point. Kmult, a statistic summarising the phylogenetic signal in multivariate data, was calculated using the R code in ref. 49.

All of the fossil paravians used in this study are exposed on the bedding plane and visible in a single, roughly two-dimensional orientation. Distortion of the bones is limited to crushing as a result of diagenetic compression of the entombing sediments. In some specimens (e.g., STM 0-7, STM 1-114, STM 5-109), minor disarticulation of the phalanges attests to a degree of pre-burial decay and rupture of the soft tissue envelope surrounding the bones. In each of these cases, disarticulation is limited to a single non-claw phalanx. In other cases (e.g., STM 0-114, STM 0-147), minor or major differences in the orientation of the digits do not permit a perfect lateral view of the toe pads and podotheca, which is the preferred orientation for determining toe pad protrusion. Importantly, lateral expansion and/or deformation of the soft tissue outlines due to compression are not considered the norm in fossil samples104,105. More specifically, decay, compression, differences in orientation, or any combination of these, and other taphonomic factors, are not considered significant biases, as the observed soft tissue outlines are frequently replicated (1) between left and right pedes, and/or (2) between specimens. Where these effects were more obvious (especially in the case of digit orientation) and where soft tissue outlines were ambiguous (e.g., in regions where two or more digits partially overlap), these digits/toe pads were not analysed herein.

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

The images and all other data pertinent to this research are available in the main text and Supplementary Information. Source Data are provided with this paper. These data can also be obtained from the corresponding authors. The fossil specimens investigated are available for scientific study by qualified researchers at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (Pittsburgh, United States), Florida Museum of Natural History (Gainesville, United States), Henan Geological Museum (Zhengzhou, China), Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology & Paleoanthroplogy (Beijing, China), Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Berlin, Germany), Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature (Pingyi China) and the Wyoming Dinosaur Center (Thermopolis, United States). Supplementary Data 1 comprises of modern avian toe pad and foot scale data as well as traditional morphometric claw data for modern birds and early theropod flyers.

O’Connor, J. K. The trophic habits of early birds. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 513, 178–195 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Dececchi, T. A. & Larsson, H. C. E. Assessing arboreal adaptations of bird antecedents: testing the ecological setting of the origin of the avian flight stroke. PLoS One 6, e22292 (2011).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Dececchi, T. A., Larrson, H. C. E., Pittman, M. & Habib, M. B. in Pennaraptoran Dinosaurs: Past Progress and New Frontiers. 440 (eds Pittman, M. & Xu, X.) 295–320 (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 2020).

Pei, R. et al. Potential for powered flight neared by most close avialan relatives, but few crossed its thresholds. Curr. Biol. 30, 4033–4046.e4038 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Larsson, H. C. E., Habib, M. B. & Dececchi, T. A. in Pennaraptoran Theropod Dinosaurs: Past Progress and New Frontiers (eds Pittman, M. & Xu, X.) 321–322 (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 2020).

Dececchi, T. A. et al. Aerodynamics show membrane-winged theropods were a poor gliding dead-end. iScience 23, 101574 (2020).

Dececchi, T. A., Larsson, H. C. E. & Habib, M. B. The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents. PeerJ 4, e2159 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Miller, C. V. & Pittman, M. The diet of early birds based on modern and fossil evidence and a new framework for its reconstruction. Biol. Rev. 96, 2058–2112 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Fowler, D. W., Freedman, E. A. & Scannella, J. B. Predatory functional morphology in raptors: interdigital variation in talon size is related to prey restraint and immobilisation technique. PLoS One 4, e7999 (2009).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Tsang, L. R., Wilson, L. A. & McDonald, P. G. Comparing the toepads of Australian diurnal and nocturnal raptors with nonpredatory taxa: insights into functional morphology. J. Morphol. 280, 1682–1692 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Höfling, E. & Abourachid, A. The skin of birds’ feet: morphological adaptations of the plantar surface. J. Morphol. 282, 88–97 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Miller, C. V., Pittman, M., Wang, X. L., Zheng, X. T. & Bright, J. A. Diet of Mesozoic toothed birds (Longipterygidae) from quantitative analysis of extant avian diet proxies. BMC Biol. 20, 101 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Habib, M. B. & Ruff, C. B. The effects of locomotion on the structural characteristics of avian limb bones. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 153, 601–624 (2008).

Article Google Scholar

Sustaita, D. et al. Getting a grip on tetrapod grasping: form, function, and evolution. Biol. Rev. 88, 380–405 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, X. L. et al. Basal paravian functional anatomy illuminated by high-detail body outline. Nat. Commun. 8, 14576 (2017).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Lucas, A. M. & Stettenheim, P. R. Avian Anatomy: Integument (US Department of Agriculture, 1972).

Lacasse, C. in Fowler's Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine (eds Miller, R. E. & Fowler, M. E.) 127–142 (Elsevier, 2014).

Lennerstedt, I. A functional study of papillae and pads in foot of passerines, parrots, and owls. Zoologica Scr. 4, 111–123 (1975).

Article Google Scholar

Lennerstedt, I. Pads, Furrows, and Papillae in the Foot of Birds (Zoologiska Institutionen, 1973).

Smith, J. & Farlow, J. in The Great Rift Valleys of Pangea in Eastern North America, Vol. 2: Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, and Paleontology (eds LeTourneau, P. & Olsen, P.) 273–292 (Columbia University Press, 2003).

Cuesta, E., Díaz-Martínez, I., Ortega, F. & Sanz, J. L. Did all theropods have chicken-like feet? First evidence of a non-avian dinosaur podotheca. Cretac. Res. 56, 53–59 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Hendrickx, C. et al. Morphology and distribution of scales, dermal ossifications, and other non-feather integumentary structures in non-avialan theropod dinosaurs. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 97, 960–1004 (2022).

Nesbitt, S. J. et al. A complete skeleton of a Late Triassic saurischian and the early evolution of dinosaurs. Science 326, 1530–1533 (2009).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Martinez, R. N. et al. A basal dinosaur from the dawn of the dinosaur era in southwestern Pangaea. Science 331, 206–210 (2011).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Müller, R. T. & Garcia, M. S. A paraphyletic ‘Silesauridae’ as an alternative hypothesis for the initial radiation of ornithischian dinosaurs. Biol. Lett. 16, 20200417 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Bell, P. R., Hendrickx, C., Pittman, M., Kaye, T. G. & Mayr, G. The exquisitely preserved integument of Psittacosaurus and the scaly skin of ceratopsian dinosaurs. Commun. Biol. 5, 809 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Quinn, T. H. & Baumel, J. J. The digital tendon locking mechanism of the avian foot (Aves). Zoomorphology 109, 281–293 (1990).

Article Google Scholar

Feduccia, A. Evidence from claw geometry indicating arboreal habits of Archaeopteryx. Science 259, 790–793 (1993).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Kambic, R. E. Multivariate Analysis of Avian and Non-avian Theropod Pedal Phalanges (Montana State University-Bozeman, College of Letters & Science, 2008).

Birn-Jeffery, A. V., Miller, C. E., Naish, D., Rayfield, E. J. & Hone, D. W. E. Pedal claw curvature in birds, lizards and mesozoic dinosaurs – complicated categories and compensating for mass-specific and phylogenetic control. PLoS One 7, e50555 (2012).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Hedrick, B. P., Cordero, S. A., Zanno, L. E., Noto, C. & Dodson, P. Quantifying shape and ecology in avian pedal claws: the relationship between the bony core and keratinous sheath. Ecol. Evolution 9, 11545–11556 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Tinius, A. & Russell, A. P. Points on the curve: an analysis of methods for assessing the shape of vertebrate claws. J. Morphol. 278, 150–169 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Thomson, T. J. & Motani, R. Functional morphology of vertebrate claws investigated using functionally based categories and multiple morphological metrics. J. Morphol. 282, 449–471 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Fowler, D. W., Freedman, E. A., Scannella, J. B. & Kambic, R. E. The predatory ecology of Deinonychus and the origin of flapping in birds. PLoS One 6, e28964 (2011).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Bock, W. J. & Miller, W. D. The scansorial foot of the woodpeckers, with comments on the evolution of perching and climbing feet in birds. Am. Mus. Novit. 1931, 1–45 (1959).

Moreno, K., Carrano, M. T. & Snyder, R. Morphological changes in pedal phalanges through ornithopod dinosaur evolution: a biomechanical approach. J. Morphol. 268, 50–63 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Gianechini, F. A., Ercoli, M. D. & Diaz-Martinez, I. Differential locomotor and predatory strategies of Gondwanan and derived Laurasian dromaeosaurids (Dinosauria, Theropoda, Paraves): Inferences from morphometric and comparative anatomical studies. J. Anat. 236, 772–797 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Falk, A. R., Kaye, T. G., Zhou, Z. H. & Burnham, D. A. Laser fluorescence illuminates the soft tissue and life habits of the Early Cretaceous bird Confuciusornis. PLoS One 11, e0167284 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Richardson, K. T., Webb, G. J. W. & Manolis, S. C. Crocodiles: Inside Out, A Guide to the Crocodilians and Their Functional Morphology (Surrey Betty and Sons, 2002).

Kaye, T. G. et al. Laser-stimulated fluorescence in paleontology. PLoS One 10, e0125923 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Wang, M., O’Connor, J. K., Xu, X. & Zhou, Z. A new Jurassic scansoriopterygid and the loss of membranous wings in theropod dinosaurs. Nature 569, 256–259 (2019).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Ostrom, J. H. Archaeopteryx and the origin of birds. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 8, 91–182 (1976).

Article Google Scholar

Mayr, G., Pohl, B., Hartman, S. & Peters, D. S. The tenth skeletal specimen of Archaeopteryx. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 149, 97–116 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Chinsamy, A., Chiappe, L. M., Marugán-Lobón, J., Chunling, G. & Zhang, F. J. Gender identification of the Mesozoic bird Confuciusornis sanctus. Nat. Commun. 4, 1381 (2013).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Wang, M., O’Connor, J. K. & Zhou, Z. H. A new robust enantiornithine bird from the Lower Cretaceous of China with scansorial adaptations. J. Vertebrate Paleontol. 34, 657–671 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Zheng, X. et al. New specimens of Yanornis indicate a piscivorous diet and modern alimentary canal. PLoS One 9, e95036 (2014).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Sim, J. & Wright, C. C. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys. Ther. 85, 257–268 (2005).

Article Google Scholar

Collyer, M. L. & Adams, D. C. RRPP: an r package for fitting linear models to high‐dimensional data using residual randomization. Methods Ecol. Evolution 9, 1772–1779 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Adams, D. C. A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Syst. Biol. 63, 685–697 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Pittman, M. et al. in Pennaraptoran Theropod Dinosaurs: Past Progess and New Frontiers (eds Pittman, M. & Xu, X.) 7–36 (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 2020).

Balanoff, A. M. & Norell, M. A. Osteology of Khaan mckennai (Oviraptorosauria: Theropoda). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 2012, 1–77 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Xing, X. et al. A new oviraptorid from the Upper Cretaceous of Nei Mongol, China, and its stratigraphic implications. Vertebrata Palasiat. 51, 85–101 (2013).

Google Scholar

Zhang, F., Zhou, Z., Xu, X. & Wang, X. A juvenile coelurosaurian theropod from China indicates arboreal habits. Naturwissenschaften 89, 394–398 (2002).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

O’Connor, J. et al. Microraptor with ingested lizard suggests non-specialized digestive function. Curr. Biol. 29, 2423–2429.e2 (2019).

Xing, L. D. et al. Piscivory in the feathered dinosaur. Microraptor. Evolution 67, 2441–2445 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Larrson, H. C. E., Hone, D. W., Dececchi, T. A., Sullivan, C. & Xu, X. The winged non‐avian dinosaur Microraptor fed on mammals: implications for the Jehol Biota ecosystem. J. Vertebrate Paleontol. Prog. Abstr. 30, 114A (2010).

Google Scholar

Campbell, B. & Lack, E. (eds) A Dictionary of Birds (T & A.D. Poyser, London, 2011).

Zhou, Z. H., Wang, Y., Xu, X. & Dong, R. in Extraordinary Fossil Occurrences of Continental Animals and Plants (eds Fraser, N. & Sues, H.) (The University of California Press, 2017).

Pei, R., Li, Q., Meng, Q., Gao, K.-Q. & Norell, M. A. A new specimen of Microraptor (Theropoda: Dromaeosauridae) from the Lower Cretaceous of western Liaoning, China. Am. Mus. Novit. 2014, 1–28 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Sorkin, B. Scansorial and aerial ability in Scansoriopterygidae and basal Oviraptorosauria. Hist. Biol. 33, 3202–3214 (2020).

Larsson, H. C. E., Hone, D. W. E., Dececchi, T. A., Sullivan, C. & Xu, X. The winged non-avian dinosaur Microraptor fed on mammals: implications for the Jehol Biota ecosystems. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 30, 120A (2010).

O’Connor, J. M., Zhou, Z. H. & Xu, X. Additional specimen of Microraptor provides unique evidence of dinosaurs preying on birds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19662–19665 (2011).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Zheng, X. T. et al. Exceptional dinosaur fossils reveal early origin of avian-style digestion. Sci. Rep. 8, 14217 (2018).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Cobb, S. E. & Sellers, W. I. Inferring lifestyle for Aves and Theropoda: a model based on curvatures of extant avian ungual bones. PLoS One 15, e0211173 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Glen, C. L. & Bennett, M. B. Foraging modes of Mesozoic birds and non-avian theropods. Curr. Biol. 17, R911–R912 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hopson, J. A. in New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds: Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom (eds Ostrom, J. H., Gall, L. F. & Gauthier, J.) 211–235 (Peabody Museum of Natural History, 2001).

Bell, A. & Chiappe, L. M. Statistical approach for inferring ecology of Mesozoic birds. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 9, 119–133 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Zhou, Z. Early Evolution of Birds and Avian Flight: Evidence from Mesozoic Fossils and Modern Birds (University of Kansas, 1999).

Rauhut, O. W. M., Foth, C. & Tischlinger, H. The oldest Archaeopteryx (Theropoda: Avialiae): a new specimen from the Kimmeridgian/Tithonian boundary of Schamhaupten, Bavaria. PeerJ 6, e4191 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Dalsätt, J., Zhou, Z., Zhang, F. & Ericson, P. G. P. Food remains in Confuciusornis sanctus suggest a fish diet. Naturwissenschaften 93, 444 (2006).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Chiappe, L. M., Shu’an, J., Qiang, J. & Norell, M. A. in Anatomy and Systematics of the Confuciusornithidae (Theropoda: Aves) from the Late Mesozoic of Northeastern China. 3–89 (Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 1999).

Elzanowski, A. in Proceedings of the 5th Symposium of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution (eds Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F.) 211–226.

Hou, L., Martin, L. D., Zhou, Z., Feduccia, A. & Zhang, F. A diapsid skull in a new species of the primitive bird Confuciusornis. Nature 399, 679 (1999).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Zhou, Z. & Hou, L. in Mesozoic Birds: Above the Heads of Dinosaurs (eds Chiappe, L. M. & Witmer, L. M.) 160–183 (University of California Press, 2002).

Zhang, Z. H. et al. Diversification in an Early Cretaceous avian genus: evidence from a new species of Confuciusornis from China. J. Ornithol. 150, 783–790 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Zinoviev, A. V. An attempt to reconstruct the lifestyle of confuciusornithids (Aves, Confuciusornithiformes). Paleontological J. 43, 444–452 (2009).

Article Google Scholar

Miller, C. V. et al. Disassociated rhamphotheca of fossil bird Confuciusornis informs early beak reconstruction, stress regime, and developmental patterns. Commun. Biol. 3, 519 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Zhou, Z., Barrett, P. M. & Hilton, J. An exceptionally preserved Lower Cretaceous ecosystem. Nature 421, 807 (2003).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Clavel, J., Julliard, R. & Devictor, V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 222–228 (2011).

Article Google Scholar

Serrano, F. J. et al. in Pennaraptoran Dinosaurs: Past Progress and New Frontiers (eds Pittman, M. & Xu, X.) 333–344 (American Museum of Natural History, 2020).

Zheng, X. et al. Fossil evidence of avian crops from the Early Cretaceous of China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15904–15907 (2011).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Zheng, X. et al. On the absence of sternal elements in Anchiornis (Paraves) and Sapeornis (Aves) and the complex early evolution of the avian sternum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 111, 13900–13905 (2014).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Serrano, F. J. & Chiappe, L. M. Aerodynamic modelling of a Cretaceous bird reveals thermal soaring during avian evolution. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20170182 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Pennycuick, C. J. Thermal soaring compared in three dissimilar tropical bird species, Fregata magnificens, Pelecanus occidentals and Coragyps atratus. J. Exp. Biol. 102, 307–325 (1983).

Article Google Scholar

Zhou, Z. & Zhang, F. Anatomy of the primitive bird Sapeornis chaoyangensis from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China. Can. J. Earth Sci. 40, 731–747 (2003).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Tsang, L. R. & McDonald, P. G. A comparative study of avian pes morphotypes, and the functional implications of Australian raptor pedal flexibility. Emu-Austral Ornithol. 119(1), 14–23 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Kemp, A. C. & Kirwan, G. M. in Birds of the World (eds Billerman, S. M., Keeney, B. K., Rodewald, P. G. & Schulenberg, T. S.) (Cornell Lab of Ornithology, 2020).

Hargrave, L. L. Mexican Macaws: Comparative Osteology and Survey of Remains from the Southwest. (University of Arizona Press, 1970).

Ksepka, D. T. & Clarke, J. A. A new stem parrot from the Green River Formation and the complex evolution of the grasping foot in Pan-Psittaciformes. J. Vertebrate Paleontol. 32, 395–406 (2012).

Article Google Scholar

Zhou, Z., Clarke, J. A., Zhang, F. & Wings, O. Gastroliths in Yanornis – an indication of the earliest radical diet switching and gizzard plasticity in the lineage leading to living birds? Naturwissenschaften 91, 571–574 (2004).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Mayr, G., Gingerich, P. D. & Smith, T. Skeleton of a new owl from the early Eocene of North America (Aves, Strigiformes) with an accipitrid-like foot morphology. J. Vertebrate Paleontol. 40, e1769116 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Field, D. J. et al. Early evolution of modern birds structured by global forest collapse at the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Curr. Biol. 28, 1825–1831 (2018).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Rico-Guevara, A. et al. in Feeding in Vertebrates: Evolution, Morphology, Behavior, Biomechanics (eds Bels, V. & Whishaw, I. Q.) 643–693 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).

McKinney, M. L. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 495–516 (1997).

Article Google Scholar

Pu, H. et al. A new juvenile specimen of Sapeornis (Pygostylia: Aves) from the Lower Cretaceous of Northeast China and allometric scaling of this basal bird. Paleontological Res. 17, 27–38 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Hawkins, P. in The Welfare of Domestic Fowl and Other Captive Birds (eds Duncan, I. J. H. & Hawkins, P.) 53–102 (Springer Netherlands, 2010).

Csermely, D. & Sponza, S. Role of experience and maturation in barn owl predatory behaviour. Ital. J. Zool. 62, 153–157 (1995).

Google Scholar

Csermely, D. & Gaibani, G. Is foot squeezing pressure by two raptor species sufficient to subdue their prey? Condor: Ornithological Appl. 100, 757–763 (1998).

Article Google Scholar

Boback, S. M. et al. Snake constriction rapidly induces circulatory arrest in rats. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 2279–2288 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Jetz, W., Thomas, G. H., Joy, J. B., Hartmann, K. & Mooers, A. O. The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491, 444–448 (2012).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Kuhl, H. et al. An unbiased molecular approach using 3′-UTRs resolves the avian family-level tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evolution 38, 108–127 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Brückner, A. & Heethoff, M. A chemo-ecologists’ practical guide to compositional data analysis. Chemoecology 27, 33–46 (2017).

Article Google Scholar

Jombart, T., Devillard, S. & Balloux, F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 11, 94 (2010).

Article Google Scholar

Briggs, D. E. G. & Williams, S. H. The restoration of flattened fossils. Lethaia 14, 157–164 (1981).

Article Google Scholar

Parry, L. A. et al. Soft-bodied fossils are not simply rotten carcasses – toward a holistic understanding of exceptional fossil preservation. BioEssays 40, 1700167 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Chiappe, L. M. & Meng, Q. J. Birds of Stone: Chinese Avian Fossils from the Age of Dinosaurs (John Hopkins University Press, 2016).

Download references

This study was supported by the General Research Fund of the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (RGC GRF 17103315, 17120920 and 17105221; M.P.), the School of Life Sciences of The Chinese University of Hong Kong, a Postgraduate Scholarship from The University of Hong Kong (PGS; C.V.M.), a Research Training Program scholarship from the Australian Government (RTP; N.J.E.), the Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province (Ts20190954; X.L.W.) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42288201; X.T.Z.). T. Alexander Dececchi is thanked for the discussions about this manuscript.

School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China

Michael Pittman & Yuen Ting Tse

School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia

Phil R. Bell, Nathan J. Enriquez & Leah R. Tsang

Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China

Case Vincent Miller

Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Linyi University, Linyi City, Shandong, 276005, China

Xiaoli Wang & Xiaoting Zheng

Shandong Tianyu Museum of Nature, Pingyi, Shandong, 273300, China

Xiaoli Wang & Xiaoting Zheng

Ornithology Collection, Australian Museum, William Street, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia

Leah R. Tsang

Department of Biology, University of Toronto Mississauga, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, L5L 1C6, Canada

Michael Landes

Foundation for Scientific Advancement, Sierra Vista, AZ, 85650, USA

Thomas G. Kaye

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

M.P., X.L.W. and T.G.K. initially designed the project. M.P. and T.G.K. collected the main project data (i.e., performed specimen imaging) with input from X.L.W., X.T.Z., P.R.B., M.L., C.V.M., N.J.E., L.R.T. and Y.T.T. All authors assessed and analysed the data. M.P., P.R.B., C.V.M., N.J.E., Y.T.T. and T.G.K wrote the paper with input from X.L.W., X.T.Z., L.R.T. and M.L.

Correspondence to Michael Pittman or Xiaoli Wang.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Nature Communications thanks Denver Fowler, Jens Lallensack and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Pittman, M., Bell, P.R., Miller, C.V. et al. Exceptional preservation and foot structure reveal ecological transitions and lifestyles of early theropod flyers. Nat Commun 13, 7684 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35039-1

Download citation

Received: 14 March 2022

Accepted: 16 November 2022

Published: 20 December 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35039-1

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.